The happy camper

By Frank Massey | Published:  13 September, 2017

It’s only when you visit the past that you realise how far the journey to the present has taken us. Some time ago Martin, a very good friend of mine from Londonderry, sent over a set of very early EVL Bosch injectors.

This injector pattern started life around the late 1960s and ran through to the mid 1980s and was used by Ferrari, Volvo, Opel, and many others. The set supplied to me came out of a VW camper van, and like many from this era were badly rusting and contaminated from in-tank corrosion. At the time fuel lines and tanks were made from untreated mild steel, and filtration did not meet current standards of 5 microns, or 2 microns with the latest HDEV 6 injectors. The biggest single cause of wear and failure was water ingress in gasoline due to condensation and external ingress.

The injectors were in a bad condition, sticking, blocked, and dribbling. I started the cleaning process with an external pre-clean ultrasonic tank before risking contamination in our ASNU bench. Several cleaning sessions later, with a varying degree of improvement, we arrived at a fully serviceable set.

I posted them back assuming it would be the last of my involvement. I should have known better. Martin and Matthew at Conlon motors have been involved with our training programme over many years. I travel over there several times a year for onsite training, and you have guessed it, waiting for me on my last visit was the camper van.

It was running extremely rich, blowing blue smoke. You could taste the emissions. If you have ever followed a vintage car you will know what I mean. This is where a trip down memory lane started.  I have not worked on this system for many years.  In fact it was on systems like this that our current-day diagnostic processes were developed.


Possible causes
So, let’s roll the dice. A rich mixture, possible causes?

  •  High fuel pressure, nominal value 2/2.5 bar
  •  Electronic control error, nominal hot injector delivery open time 2.2m/s
  •  Uncontrolled delivery past the injector


Considering my knowledge of the injector condition and hoping further contamination had not entered the system, together with the fact I did not have my fuel pressure gauges with me,  I elected to go for electronic control error.
The first step should be to understand the critical components in forming the fuel calculation values. Bosch LE is a pretty basic system; a NTC coolant sensor, nominal value hot 1v, air vane meter, nominal value at idle 1v, throttle position switch, and ambient air sensor in air vane meter, nominal value 20º 3v.

Always simplify your first steps to ascertain what the problem is. So, my first measurement was injector open time, this was approx. 12m/s at idle.  This value represented full throttle load. My next test focused on the coolant sensor which was correct. The idle, full load switch was ok, directing me to the major load calculation component, the air vane meter.
Experience reminded me of historical problems. For example, ignition backfire through the induction system nearly always distorted the vane causing sticking and severe over-fuelling. Placing my finger in the vane aperture confirmed the vane was free, but the spring pressure was too weak.


Spring tension
The penny drops! The previous problem of blocked injectors had been compensated by adjusting the vane spring tension. This was a common tool for subtle tuning, but not a blunt instrument for error correction. How do you adjust the spring? It’s quite simple really; increase tension until the injector open value reaches 2.2m/s. I also set the air bypass bleed to a 50% position. So far so good, engine now much smoother, with no blue smoke. Time for the gas analyser. Not unexpectedly, it registered high CO. The problem of course was fuel oil contamination. An oil change reduced the CO value to an impressive 1% with HCs of 100ppm.
What relevance has this on current systems? Everything! It’s the process and discipline that’s evolved into diagnosing today’s more complex systems. I often find myself saying to training course delegates: “Don’t complicate problems, apply common sense and logic.” Things have changed dramatically. Today’s skill-sets are found in several key areas; the ability to interpret serial data, a thorough understanding of system knowledge and component responsibility. It is vital to have the ability to evaluate oscilloscope and various pressure measurements.

I have missed out the most challenging of all; the dark arts of software intervention. I should acknowledge that given 50 years of experience, the ability of diagnosis and test functions through a serial platform is staggering. I am of course referring to VM level access. Nothing else comes close.
 
Further information
Please contact Annette on:
01772 201 597 or email enquiries@ads-global.co.uk.

Related Articles

  • IMI: UK garages unprepared for EV surge 

    The Institute of the Motor Industry (IMI), has voiced its concern for the safety of technicians after electric vehicle sales reach a record high.

  • Cut to the chase 

    Many modern systems, such as common rail diesel injection, can appear to be so complex that they seem to operate by magic. Over time, such systems are only going to become more and more complex, so understanding them means you can gain a head start on their repair.
        
    You can be presented with a seemingly endless amount of data relating to fuel pressure feedback, fuel pressure control, cam/crank synchronisation, measured mass airflow, injector flow correction feedback, and many other areas.
        
    However, if you prepare yourself with a fundamental understanding of the system and all data available pertaining to the fault, a systematic approach to the fault-finding procedure can be carried out.  
    Data overload

    Figure 1 shows  the live data returned from a common rail diesel injection vehicle with an EDC16 engine management system.
        
    There is an enormous amount of data available from these data parameters, which can allow you to ascertain the nature of the fault. The actual operation of the fuel system can be compared to the desired system operation and using the data, a decision can be made on the condition of the system and where a fault (if any) may be.
        
    An oscilloscope is another important tool when investigating a fault with such a complex system. Figure 2 shows an oscilloscope waveform from an Audi with the 2.0L common rail engine. The yellow trace is the fuel rail pressure sensor voltage (feedback) and the green trace is the current flow through the inlet metering valve (command). The waveform was captured during a wide open throttle (WOT) condition.
        
    This image alone tells us that the fuel inlet metering valve is a normally open valve. The engine control module (ECM) decreases the duty cycle when the required fuel pressure is increased. This allows less current to flow through the solenoid and the valve is allowed to open, which increases the fuel pressure measured at the fuel rail.

    Full analysis
    When the fuel pressure demand decreases, the duty cycle control from the ECM increases. This allows more current to flow through the solenoid which results in a reduction of the fuel pressure. Duty cycle is often referred to as pulse width modulation (PWM) control.

    The duty cycle control on the ground side of the fuel inlet metering valve can be analysed using an oscilloscope, as seen in Figure 3. The waveform below displays the fuel rail pressure feedback voltage (yellow trace) and the fuel inlet metering valve duty cycle control from the ECM (green trace).
        
    The oscilloscope is connected to the control wire for the fuel inlet metering valve. The technician must be mindful that this is the ground control circuit. System voltage on this wire indicates open circuit voltage. The diagram in Figure 4 shows the best method of connecting this set-up.
        
    By careful analysis using serial (scan-tool) and parallel (oscilloscope) diagnostics you will now be in a position to identify the area of concern accurately and in a timely manner. Knowledge, together with the right equipment and experience therefore benefits technicians by leading to a reduced diagnostic time and an easier fault finding method, rendering these complex systems much less so.

  • DriveTec range extended as sales continue to grow  

    The Parts Alliance says it is continuing to see impressive sales growth across its DriveTec range.

  • Klarius increases UK manufacturing capacity 

    Recent investment has provided Klarius with increased manufacturing capacity for automotive OEM and aftermarket emission control products including exhausts, CATs and DPFs.

  • part two: A FINE PENSION MESS and how to avoid it  

    Pensions auto-enrolment, the government’s drive to have everyone saving towards their retirement is just over five years old and recently, this last February, completed its rollout. However, while it might be the end of the rollout as far as the government is concerned, for businesses, the process is never-ending as the obligations continue… forever.
        
    Ignoring the rules and failing to meet the obligations can lead to very painful penalties being imposed by The Pensions Regulator.

    Don’t fall foul of any changes to the rules
    The government has done a pretty good job of improving the rules as they go along, even though they may seem rather onerous at first. Nathan Long, a Senior Pension analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown, explains more about how firms can be caught out by the law.
        
    Nathan says that there “is a ruthless determination to ensure auto-enrolment remains successful and the government recently made recommendations as to future changes to the legislation.”
        
    The two key changes for employers are that staff will need to be automatically enrolled from age 18 as opposed to 22; and contributions will accrue from the first pound of earnings, whereas currently the first £5,876 can be excluded.
        
    Nathan says the changes are great for pension savers, but will impact on some sectors more heavily, especially those that employ large numbers of younger people: “These recommendations will not only mean people retiring with more income, it means they will have greater control over leaving work. In fact, someone with average earnings could increase their pension pot at retirement by over £60,000.
        
    “Increasing the reach of auto-enrolment is great for the long-term retirement prospects of the nation but adds yet further costs for businesses. The government is clearly mindful of this alongside the ongoing Brexit uncertainty and so opted for a long implementation period, with the changes not due to be rolled out until the mid-2020s.
        
    “Even so,” reckons Nathan, “it is widely recognised that 8% contributions are not enough for a comfortable retirement, with a growing consensus that contributions of 12% are more appropriate – the government has also recommended reviewing the minimum contribution levels from April 2019. Small businesses in particular should be alive to the very real risk of increased costs coming down the tracks.”
        Empirical evidence is showing larger employers driving higher levels of understanding and engagement amongst their staff by embracing workplace financial education programmes. Nathan thinks that smaller businesses may struggle to offer these services: “A possible solution to improved engagement could lie in allowing staff to be able to select where their auto-enrolment pension contributions are paid if they already have their own pension plan.” There would still be a company appointed provider for anyone that doesn’t choose, however anyone who has truly got to grips with their pension planning could continue to contribute to their preferred plan. The responsibility would then be on pension providers to engage their customers in order to retain their business.

    Nathan thinks this solution need not add more administration for employers: “In the same way that you require an employee’s bank account details, so you can pay their salary, simple details of pension provider and policy number could allow correct payment of pension contributions. The technology to enable this already exists, it simply must be adopted for this revised purpose.”

    To finish
    The key message for employers of any size is that auto-enrolment is an on-going exercise and crucially requires on-going compliance with any rule changes. First up will be the contribution hikes in 2018 and 2019, but employers need to keep their wits about them. Whilst it may seem The Pension Regulator is out to get small businesses, actually the opposite is true and its website is a great source of information for businesses of all shapes and sizes: www.thepensionsregulator.gov.uk


Search

Sign Up

For the latest news and updates from Aftermarket Magazine.


Poll

Where should the next Automechanika show be held?



Facebook


©DFA Media 1999-2018